![]() And then, during these photoshoots, things then turn sexual WITH (known by these models or not) the camera still turned on (which is why there are these videos making the rounds now).How is this no different from a gay male teacher who has sex with his male students for them to get good grades? Or – venturing into the straight world in the international fashion industry – the likes of famed photographers Terry Richardson, Mario Testino and Bruce Weber who were all accused of using their prominence/positions of power to take advantage of their (fame-seeking or just-making-a-living) models? ![]() But if judgment of him is solely based on the videos making the rounds and the discussions surrounding these videos, then it can be (rightly) claimed that a position of power was used to take advantage of others.The basic facts are: as the man behind the camera, Fabe was in a position of power, able to “lure” these wannabe actors/models for photoshoots (via cheap rates, free shoots, et cetera). ![]() Don’t type it, and the reprehensible #VicFabeScandal hashtag appears in LGBTQI-related feeds anyway.Let’s get this one out first: What consenting adults do in their bedrooms (or, if the case may be, in their studios) is their business.BUT when acts (sexual or not) happen coupled with abuses of power/authority, then we’re entering the #MeToo domain.Fabe may deserve to be heard, too (so we can get his side of the story). ![]() Type the guy’s name, and Google will give you links related to his “scandal”.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |